EUROPEAN ARMED FORCES
published by the European-Society Coudenhove-Kalergi, GS Heinz Wimpissinger
written by Bernd
Posselt, President of the Pan-European Union, Germany
65
years ago the former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, one of
the staunchest supporters of the Pan-European founder Richard
Coudenhove-Kalergi, demanded that a European army be formed. He made
this request not as a private citizen, but quite officially as the
responsible correspondent of the Parliamentary Assembly of the
recently created Council of Europe – this also being a brain child
of Coudenhove. Only one month later the US signaled their interest
to the construction of such a European defence force. The French
Prime Minister René Pleven shortly afterwards proposed the plan for
a European Defence Community. Even the Pan-European Bavarian Franz
Josef Strauss passionately defended the idea of a European
Defence Community with its own European army. The EU would transform
itself in something like the United States of Europe. And thus, on
equal footing with the United States, be one of the two pillars of
NATO. Since then the proposal for a European Defence Community has
regularly flickered up only to be immediately extinguished.
Last
summer an interview with the President of the European Commission,
Jean-Claude Juncker, holder of both the Coudenhove as well as the
Strauss Awards, revived this issue with quite positive echoes. The
theme has provoked greater resonance than at any time since the
fifties - which is probably due to two factors: The particularly
grave threats posed by Putin through to the ISIS terror, combined
with the dramatic shrinking of the coffers and the technical
capabilities of the nation states.
The
resulting pressure has, however, in recent years lead to a number of
pragmatic steps towards a Europeanisation of security and defense
policies. Within the EU, which for decades was not allowed to deal
with these issues due to the blockade imposed by some Member States,
there is now a European Military Committee (EUMC), a European Union
Military Staff (EUMS), a European Defence Agency (EDA) for the
European armaments cooperation, a EU Satellite Centre (EUSC) and the
European Union Institute for Security Studies (ISS). The European
Defence Agency is positioned directly under the High Representatives
of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy - which means it is
linked to the very pinnacles of the EU, concretely by way of the
Italian Federica Morgherini, the European Ministers for External
Affairs, the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament: in
other words the classic European institutions.
A
concrete vision must first of all clarify the relationship of the
Nation State with the European level in the field of defense. Pure
intergovernmentalism is much too cumbersome. The EU needs a
supranational, composite task force to which every EU citizen can
apply to directly. This task force must be financed by the EU budget,
controlled democratically by the European Parliament and commanded by
an EU Defence Commission in close cooperation with the Council of
Member States. The Council and the Parliament must agree by a
qualified majority to any military interventions.
A
European army worthy of its name would best come into being when
national forces are closely coordinated, and supranational forces are
clearly integrated at the appropriate political level, being that of
the EU institutions - even if individual Member States such as the UK
should choose to exercise an opt-out clause.
Comments
Post a Comment